APA PsycNET Our Apologies! - The following features are not available with your current Browser configuration. - page navigation - memorize search form information - display database popup information - adjust limits on search form
Skip Navigation

PsycNET®

  • PsycARTICLES:
  • Citation and Abstract
Semantic priming from letter-searched primes occurs for low- but not high-frequency targets: Automatic semantic access may not be a myth.
Tse, Chi-Shing; Neely, James H.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol 33(6), Nov 2007, 1143-1161.
[Correction Notice: An erratum for this article was reported in Vol 34(1) of Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (see record 2007-19381-019). In the article "Semantic Priming From Letter-Searched Primes Occurs for Low- but Not High- Frequency Targets: Automatic Semantic Access May Not Be a Myth," by Chi-Shing Tse and James H. Neely (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2007, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1143-1161), the URL for the supplemental materials was incomplete. The complete URL is http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1143.supp] Letter-search (LS) within a prime often eliminates semantic priming. In 2 lexical decision experiments, the authors found that priming from LS primes occurred for low-frequency (LF) but not high-frequency (HF) targets whether the target's word frequency was manipulated between or within participants and whether the prime-target pairs were associated symmetrically or forward asymmetrically. For the LF targets, LS priming was (a) equivalent for forward asymmetric and symmetric pairs and (b) equal to silent-read (SR) priming for forward asymmetric pairs but less than SR priming for symmetric pairs. The typical finding of greater SR priming for response times for LF than for HF targets occurred for symmetric priming but not for forward asymmetric priming, which showed the interaction for errors. The authors consider their findings' implications for various accounts of how LS affects priming and explain the findings within J. H. Neely and D. E. Keefe's (1989) 3-process model as follows: (a) LS eliminates expectancy and semantic matching but does not reduce semantic activation and (b) expectancy contributes to SR priming for HF targets but not for LF targets, whereas the opposite is so for semantic matching. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)
  • Digital Object Identifier:
  • 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1143
Note: Your library may have purchased access to this information through another service provider.