APA PsycNET Our Apologies! - The following features are not available with your current Browser configuration. - get an abstract for a record - mobile App popup - get an abstract for a record - get all abstracts for all records - page navigation - memorize search form information - display database popup information - adjust limits on search form
Skip Navigation

Home

Facebook image Twitter image
APA PsycNET Direct
Article Selected
Add to Cart
$11.95
How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms.
By Colzato, Lorenza S.; Bajo, Maria Teresa; van den Wildenberg, Wery; Paolieri, Daniela; Nieuwenhuis, Sander; La Heij, Wido; Hommel, Bernhard
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol 34(2), Mar 2008, 302-312.
Abstract
It has been claimed that bilingualism enhances inhibitory control, but the available evidence is equivocal. The authors evaluated several possible versions of the inhibition hypothesis by comparing monolinguals and bilinguals with regard to stop signal performance, inhibition of return, and the attentional blink. These three phenomena, it can be argued, tap into different aspects of inhibition. Monolinguals and bilinguals did not differ in stop signal reaction time and thus were comparable in terms of active-inhibitory efficiency. However, bilinguals showed no facilitation from spatial cues, showed a strong inhibition of return effect, and exhibited a more pronounced attentional blink. These results suggest that bilinguals do not differ from monolinguals in terms of active inhibition but have acquired a better ability to maintain action goals and to use them to bias goal-related information. Under some circumstances, this ability may indirectly lead to more pronounced reactive inhibition of irrelevant information. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)