APA PsycNET Our Apologies! - The following features are not available with your current Browser configuration. - get an abstract for a record - mobile App popup - get an abstract for a record - get all abstracts for all records - page navigation - memorize search form information - display database popup information - adjust limits on search form
Skip Navigation

Home

Facebook image Twitter image
APA PsycNET Direct
Article Selected
Add to Cart
$11.95
Resolution of conflict between goal-directed actions: Outcome encoding and neural control processes.
By de Wit, Sanne; Ostlund, Sean B.; Balleine, Bernard W.; Dickinson, Anthony
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, Vol 35(3), Jul 2009, 382-393.
Abstract
According to O-R theory of instrumental learning, incongruent biconditional discriminations should be impossible to solve in a goal-directed manner because the event acting as the outcome of one response also acts as a discriminative stimulus for an opposite response. Each event should therefore be associated with two competing responses. However, Dickinson and de Wit (2003) have presented evidence that rats can learn incongruent discriminations. The present study investigated whether rats were able to engage additional processes to solve incongruent discriminations in a goal-directed manner. Experiment 1 provides evidence that rats resolve the response conflict that arises in the incongruent discrimination by differentially encoding events in their roles as discriminative stimulus and as outcome. Furthermore, Experiment 2 shows that once goal-directed control has been established the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex is not directly involved in its maintenance but rather plays a central role in conflict resolution processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)