APA PsycNET Our Apologies! - The following features are not available with your current Browser configuration. - get an abstract for a record - mobile App popup - display, print, save, export, and email selected records - get My List count - save record to My List - get references associated with a record - Abstract ImpactStatement Language Switch - page navigation - memorize search form information - display database popup information - adjust limits on search form
Skip Navigation
qqwutswe

Home

Facebook image Twitter image
Login    Languages 

Record Display

Citation

Database: PsycARTICLES
[ Journal Article ]
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: Transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.
Uher, Jana; Call, Josep
Journal of Comparative Psychology, Vol 122(2), May 2008, 204-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204

Abstract

  1. We tested 6 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), 3 orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), 4 bonobos (Pan paniscus), and 2 gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in the reversed reward contingency task. Individuals were presented with pairs of quantities ranging between 0 and 6 food items. Prior to testing, some experienced apes had solved this task using 2 quantities while others were totally naïve. Experienced apes transferred their ability to multiple-novel pairs after 6 to 19 months had elapsed since their initial testing. Two out of 6 naïve apes (1 chimpanzee, 1 bonobo) solved the task--a proportion comparable to that of a previous study using 2 pairs of quantities. Their acquisition speed was also comparable to the successful subjects from that study. The ratio between quantities explained a large portion of the variance but affected naïve and experienced individuals differently. For smaller ratios, naïve individuals were well below 50% correct and experienced ones were well above 50%, yet both groups tended to converge toward 50% for larger ratios. Thus, some apes require no procedural modifications to overcome their strong bias for selecting the larger of 2 quantities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Links