Our Apologies!

The following features are not available with your current Browser configuration

- display, print, save, export, and email selected records - get My List count - save record to My List - get references associated with a record - page navigation - memorize search form information - display database popup information - adjust limits on search form
Skip Navigation

Home

System maintenance is scheduled for Sunday evening, November 22, from 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM EST. PsycNET will be unavailable during that time.

Record Display

Citation

Database: PsycARTICLES
[Journal Article]
Linda is not a bearded lady: Configural weighting and adding as the cause of extension errors.
Nilsson, Håkan; Winman, Anders; Juslin, Peter; Hansson, Göran
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Vol 138(4), Nov 2009, 517-534.

Abstract

  1. This article explores the configural weighted average (CWA) hypothesis suggesting that extension biases, like conjunction and disjunction errors, occur because people estimate compound probabilities by taking a CWA of the constituent probabilities. The hypothesis suggests a process consistent with well-known cognitive constraints, which nonetheless achieves high robustness and bounded rationality in noisy real-life environments. Predictions by the CWA hypothesis are that in error-free data, conjunction and disjunction errors should be the rule rather than the exception when pairs of statements are randomly sampled from an environment, the rate of extension errors should increase when noise in data is decreased, and that adding a likely component should increase the probability of a conjunction. Four experiments generally verify the predictions by the hypothesis, demonstrating that extension errors are frequent also when tasks are selected according to representative design. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved)

Links