Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Home

Database: PsycARTICLES

[ Journal Article ]

Graham, Jesse; Haidt, Jonathan; Nosek, Brian A.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 96(5), May 2009, 1029-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015141

How and why do moral judgments vary across the political spectrum? To test moral foundations theory (J. Haidt & J. Graham, 2007; J. Haidt & C. Joseph, 2004), the authors developed several ways to measure people’s use of 5 sets of moral intuitions: Harm/care, Fairness/reciprocity, Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/respect, and Purity/sanctity. Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally. This difference was observed in abstract assessments of the moral relevance of foundation-related concerns such as violence or loyalty (Study 1), moral judgments of statements and scenarios (Study 2), “sacredness” reactions to taboo trade-offs (Study 3), and use of foundation-related words in the moral texts of religious sermons (Study 4). These findings help to illuminate the nature and intractability of moral disagreements in the American “culture war.” (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)