APA PsycNET Our Apologies! - The following features are not available with your current Browser configuration. - get an abstract for a record - mobile App popup - display, print, save, export, and email selected records - get My List count - save record to My List - get references associated with a record - Abstract ImpactStatement Language Switch - page navigation - memorize search form information - display database popup information - adjust limits on search form
Skip Navigation
dcvzadwveusucvzqtfr

Home

Facebook image Twitter image
Login    Languages 

Record Display

Citation

Database: PsycARTICLES
[ Journal Article ]
Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot.
West, Richard F.; Meserve, Russell J.; Stanovich, Keith E.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 103(3), Sep 2012, 506-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028857

Abstract

  1. The so-called bias blind spot arises when people report that thinking biases are more prevalent in others than in themselves. Bias turns out to be relatively easy to recognize in the behaviors of others, but often difficult to detect in one's own judgments. Most previous research on the bias blind spot has focused on bias in the social domain. In 2 studies, we found replicable bias blind spots with respect to many of the classic cognitive biases studied in the heuristics and biases literature (e.g., Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). Further, we found that none of these bias blind spots were attenuated by measures of cognitive sophistication such as cognitive ability or thinking dispositions related to bias. If anything, a larger bias blind spot was associated with higher cognitive ability. Additional analyses indicated that being free of the bias blind spot does not help a person avoid the actual classic cognitive biases. We discuss these findings in terms of a generic dual-process theory of cognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Links