"Repression-Sensitization and Medical Diagnosis": Erratum.

Citation

Schwartz, M. S., Krupp, N. E., & Byrne, D. (1972). "Repression-Sensitization and Medical Diagnosis": Erratum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 80(3), 270.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0020136

Abstract

Reports an error in the original article by Mark S. Schwartz, Neal E. Krupp, and Donn Byrne (Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971[Dec], 78[3], 286-291). In Table 3 the number of female repressors in the 60-69 age group, with a purely organic diagnosis, should be 16 instead of 6. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1972-09554-001.) The transsituational consistency of trait measures can be demonstrated best through the establishment of relationships between personality test responses and nontest behaviors. The repression-sensitization scale shows promise as a correlate of both psychological disturbance and physiological malfunctioning. The association between repression-sensitization scale responses and medical diagnoses was investigated in 360 medical patients representing (a) 3 age levels (20-29, 40-49, and 60-69); (b) 3 repression-sensitization levels (repressors, neutrals, and sensitizers); and (c) both sexes, with 20 patients in each group. Repressors tended to have purely organic diagnoses, whereas sensitizers received diagnoses involving psychological components (p < .001). Organic diagnoses increased with age, but the proportional increase for repressors and sensitizers did not differ. (22 ref.) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)